An infamous moment in the United States, September 11, 2001 was a day that changed the lives of every American and every person that would ever attempt coming in to the country. Unfortunately, from this day came The War on Terror and xenophobia, the fear and distrust of strangers like immigrants. September 11th sparked new national security measures, as well as immigration reform.
Immigration in Silicon Valley has always been a major battleground because of what it means to the tech industry. As most know, Silicone Valley is the epicenter of technology, not just in the United States, but in the entire world. This small stretch of land from San Jose California and Palo Alto, California has been the birthplace of almost every tech giant; Facebook, Google, Apple, eBay, Netflix, Tesla, EA Games, and more. Though the types of immigrants in Silicon Valley are not typically the ones that require same day release bonds in the sense that they are legal, a republican majority could mean a difficult time immigrating legally. It also could mean that these talented individuals’ families will either have to leave or face a long legalization process.
The clear majority of leading STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering and Math) professionals in the United States immigrated from other countries. Immigration in Silicon Valley is very important, and is the reason why big names like Microsoft’s Bill Gates and Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg are so outspoken and in favor of a simple and inviting immigration policy. Rather than the need for same-day release bonds, Silicon Valley moguls want to avoid immigration detention altogether.
Of course, no one is certain of the changes a Republican house, senate and presidency will have on immigration policy, but the likelihood of stricter immigration reforms is high. The main concern for most Silicon Valley companies has been the expansion of H-1B visas, which will probably take a backseat to an agenda geared towards a strengthening of immigration restrictions.
Bondsmen are working harder than ever before because so many people need immigration bail bonds. New statistics on the current state of immigrants in detention centers has reached a critical point, and immigration experts worry that something has got to give. There are now officially more than 42,000 immigrants in detention centers in the United States, the most there has ever been.
The number of immigrants in detention centers is alarming for a number of reasons. Firstly, we are in an election year, and immigration policies are going to be changing very soon, but in what way? There is still no clear winner in the upcoming election, and because both parties have such a polar opposite opinion on immigration reform, the changes are likely to be very different. Consequently, until the elections next month, immigration bail bonds are being issued by families in an attempt to get their loved ones released as soon as possible.
Secondly, the number of immigrants in detention centers highlights the issues of a broken system. Immigrants that come to the United States are captured, sent to detention centers, released through the use of immigration bail bonds, only to flee again when the opportunity arises.
Of course no clear solution exists, but the opposition in politics does not help get the issue resolved and leaves it stagnant. Immigration experts and immigration bail bondsmen have hopes that immigration reform measures will be taken in the near future, and that the path to citizenship will be streamlined, more efficient, and diminish detention centers holding immigrants other than criminals.
ONe question we ask more often is this: are immigration bonds too high in areas like Texas? The price of immigration bonds does have an indisputable relation to how difficult it is for immigrants to get a fair shake on immigration.
The Hispanic population in Florida consists of 34 percent of the total voters in the sunshine state. The United States Presidential Election, coming up in 4 weeks, will have a major focus on immigration issues and the current political atmosphere couldn’t be messier.
Soon the American people will have to make an educated vote for the next president. With the polls being fueled by political and moral biased, US Immigration Bonds & Insurance Services realize it is now more important than ever for the voters to take the time to educate themselves on the facts of the election and immigration policies.
In a recent interview, Senator Marco Rubio stepped back from his support of the comprehensive immigration reform saying “no legislation can be expected to pass unless Americans are assured their borders are secure, and the immigration system is modernized and streamlined.”
Voter turnout in the Swing State will greatly affect these issues. In regards to South Floridians, voter turnout and beliefs on the matter will have a major impact coming this Nov. 8, 2016. Many Cuban and Latin Americans living here in South Florida have family members here illegally, many of which are currently in immigration limbo.
The election’s effect on US Immigration Bonds and immigration policies is still unclear and depending on the election’s outcome, could lead to a spike in detainees by the department of homeland security. This factor in itself is making many Americans realize how important it is to be informed about immigration policies and their responsibility as an American voter.
Since Obama’s initial announcement of his Executive Action plan in November, American’s have been battling with how to move forward with immigration reform.
As you may recall, Obama’s executive action on immigration states that he would allow temporary safety for up to four million illegal immigrants from deportation, and grant them work visas. In February, Texas denied the executive action saying President Obama ‘overstepped’ his authority. On May 26, a panel of judges from the Fifth Circuit again denied Obama’s administration’s emergency request to override Texas’ shutdown.
On July 10th, government lawyers made another effort to persuade the federal court of appeals to permit Obama’s executive action to move forward. No decision has yet been made, the two judges on the panel are the same two conservatives that ruled against the initial attempt in May – Judge Jerry Smith and Judge Jennifer Elrod.
This set back could have extensive damage to Mr. Obama as he had hope this would be the central piece of his legacy. It now seems that Obama’s argument on ‘having had the full authority to carry out the vast programs nationwide’ has left the Democrats in slow-moving deliberations with the Supreme Court, which they hope will rule favorable before his term ending next year.